KURT ROHRS

CUSD SCHOOL BOARD CANDIDATE

Our Evaluation

Mr. Rohrs, a Chandler resident since 1995 and father of three CUSD graduates, is seeking re-election to the Governing Board after joining in 2023. He's a financial advisor with a chemistry degree and MBA in Finance. He brings practical insight from his roles as substitute teacher, volunteer tutor/coach, and former chair of the district’s Citizen’s Budget Committee.

Rohrs positions himself as a strong advocate for parental rights, fiscal responsibility—including reducing administrative overhead to maximize classroom funding—and core academics, while emphasizing reading and math proficiency, career pathways, practical skills, and rigorous safety protocols across all campuses. He insists schools avoid political activism, explicit materials, and expansive social roles without clear parental consent. His voting record shows consistent dissenting votes, often alone, against excessive bond proposals, certain nonprofit partnerships, and budget items he sees as insufficiently restrained amid declining enrollment.

Supporters value his independent oversight, transparency efforts, and commitment to empowering teachers while treating parents as true partners. Critics, however, view him as combative, arguing that his resistance to broader student supports and push to counter perceived ideological biases.

Overall, Rohrs offers a clear, consistent voice for an academics-first approach, appealing to voters who prioritize measurable outcomes, parental authority, and spending discipline in a district facing post-pandemic challenges. It is for these reasons that:

We Do Recommend this candidate.

Endorsements

Legislative District 13 Republicans
Website states, "coming soon"

On the Issues

Key Patterns in Voting Record

Fiscal restraint and opposition to excessive spending: Rohrs routinely challenges budgets, reserves, bonds, and expenditures. He cast the lone dissenting vote against placing a major bond (initially ~$487M, later scaled down on the ballot) citing doubled debt, shrinking enrollment, excess capacity, and tax burden on property owners. Voters agreed with him. Similar opposition appeared on later bond/override proposals.

yourvalley.net
Resistance to non-core programs and partnerships: He voted against an MOU with a nonprofit (East Valley Dream Center) for student support services, arguing it diverts from academics and lacks sufficient parental consent/vetting.

chandlernews.com
Budget adjustments and staffing: Amid enrollment declines and shortfalls, he has opposed or pushed back on certain revisions/plans. He has supported some cuts but criticized processes or insufficient focus on district-level/non-student-facing reductions. In one case, he and Ryan Heap voted no on a motion for additional options prioritizing broader cuts.

kjzz.org
Consent agendas and transparency: He has questioned items moved to consent agendas (e.g., large contract addendums) and pushed for more discussion/separation of routine but costly items.

yourvalley.net
Cultural/ideological issues:
- Suggested optional PragerU Kids materials to balance perceived left-leaning content (not a direct vote, but agenda request).
- Supported pulling or debating items like association dues (e.g., Arizona School Boards Association membership, where he voted against in a 3-1).
  
  chandlernews.com
- Aligned with other "parental rights" board members (e.g., seconding motions by Ryan Heap on related issues, which often failed 3-2).
  
  chandlernews.com
Other areas: He has pushed for higher academic standards (e.g., questioning proficiency gaps by demographics in math presentations) and challenged district priorities during work sessions.

fhtimes.com

Overall, he participates actively—asking detailed questions, referencing budget committee experience, and emphasizing academics-first, parental involvement, and " I let teachers teach" without political pressures. He rarely joins unanimous votes on high-spending or expansive items.

HOME

BACK